| |
Thursday July 13, 2006
7:00 – 7:30 am Registration and Coffee and Pastries:
Open Space
7:30 – 8:45 am Plenary Session: Room 195
Lafferty, Steve (Planning and Zoning, Howard County Maryland).
"As your county gets older. . ." Planning for senior needs.
Howard County, Maryland is located between Washington, DC an
Baltimore. And, while its median age is less than 35 years old,
it is predicted that 31% of the population will be over the age
of 55 in the next 25 years. This shift has begun and is having
a significant impact on the County’s housing stock. These
changes caused the County to take a new look at the needs for
and the provision of housing for older residents. The result was
a Senior Housing Master Plan, completed in late 2004. Working
with an Advisory Group of residents, developers, and advocates,
County officials crafted a report and set of recommendations to
create more units, to assist older residents as they age in place
and to address the growing need for affordable units. Two key
concepts wove throughout the discussion and thinking about senior
housing – access to needed services and the principles of
universal design. This session describes the issues, recommendations
and status of efforts to provide more affordable senior housing
in the County.
Transcript of Steve Lafferty
Powerpoint:
Steve Lafferty
8:45 – 9:00 am Break
9:00 -10:15 a.m. Plenary Session: Open
Space
Cohen, Regina (Associate Professor, Federal University
of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) Research and teaching of accessibility
and universal design in Brazil: Hindrances and challenges in a developing
country.
This paper deals with accessibility and universal design situations
in Brazil. Most Brazilian cities have physical barriers that restrict
circulation of people. Although eliminating these barriers can increase
opportunities for every citizen, we must also eliminate attitudinal
barriers, which because of their invisibility may be harder to fix.
Until recently, Brazil has lacked information and awareness about
the importance of these issues to urban planning and public policies.
Architects, engineers, urban planners, professionals, technicians
and the public share responsibility. Facing the challenge of improving
access to urban space, the architects Regina Cohen and Cristiane
Duarte (authors of this paper) created the Núcleo Pro-acesso
(Accessibility Research Bureau, ARB) in 1999, linking it to a line
of research in the Post-graduate Studies Program in Architecture
(PROARQ) in the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ). Through
targeting design professionals, ARB research – coordinated
by these professors – has produced reports aimed at create
more accessible spaces for everyone. This session discusses our
educational experiences, research projects, and the Brazilian reality.
The undergraduate curriculum tries to stimulate knowledge, through
dynamic methods covering theory, simulation and intense design activity
to motivate students to consider human diversity, accessibility,
and the “Other” as key design concerns. The Post-graduate
curriculum adds evaluation techniques and analyses for accessibility
and universal design. The results have spread through the city.
The ‘new minds’ shaped by our program targets the effective
change in a developing country, such as Brazil. Huge challenges
require daring action, such as ours.
Transcript of Regina Cohen
10:15 -10:30 Break
10:45 – Noon Breakout Sessions
Universal Design and Visitability Guidelines: Room
195
- Bright, Diane (Alliance Therapy/Access Answers, Troy, MI.,
and University of Salford, Manchester, England). Influencing
change in design for residential builds in the UK and US.
Powerpoint: Diane
Bright
- Maisel, Jordana (IDEA Center, Buffalo, NY). Visitability as
an approach to inclusive housing.
Powerpoint
of Jordana Maisel
- Hashas, Mine; Ross, Catherine; & Sanford, Jon (Georgia
Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA). Livable communities and
universal design: A reconciliation.
Transcript
of the Universal Design Session
• Policy: Room 175
- Topping, Bob (Designable Environments Inc., Mississauga, Ontario,
Canada); & Wood, Kim (City of London, Ontario, Canada).
FADS: The little standard that grew.
Powerpoint: Bob
Topping
- Tosca, Theano Frannie (Aristotle University of Thessaloniki,
Thessalonika, Greece). Cities within cities.
Powerpoint: Theano
Tosca
- Smith, Eleanor (Concrete Change, Atlanta, GA). Lessons learned:
An overview of successful visitability ordinances.
Powerpoint: Eleanor Smith
Noon – 1:15 pm Lunch and Plenary Session:
Open Space
Fletcher, Valerie (Executive Director, Adaptive Environments,
Boston, MA). New definition of disability/master planning/opportunity(!):
Two case studies.
Transcript of Valerie Fletcher
Powerpoint:
Valerie Fletcher
1:15– 1:30 pm Break
1:30 – 2:45 pm Breakout Sessions
• Universal Design and Visitability Guidelines:
Room 195
- Payne, Andrew (North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC).
Understanding change in place: Spatial Cognition acquired by
visually impaired users through change in footpath materials.
Powerpoint: Andrew
Payne
- Popov, Lubomir (Bowling Green State University. Bowling Green,
OH). Big and Tall: New Candidates for Universal Design?
Powerpoint:
Lubomir Popov
• Policy: Room 175
- Casselman, Joel (Winnipeg, Manitoba). Step by step guide to
developing a visitability policy.
Powerpoint: Joel Casselman
- Wiitala, Wendy (The Ability Center of Toledo. Sylvanna, OH).
Visitability: An exercise in grassroots advocacy and legislation.
Powerpoint:
Wendy Wiitala
Transcript of the Policy Session
Tour (may go beyond 2:45): Teaford, Margaret (The Ohio
State University). Tour to the Universal Design Exhibit:
Tour Meet at the main entrance to Knowlton Hall.
2:45 – 3:00 pm Break
3:00 – 4:15 pm Plenary Session:
Knowlton Hall Auditorium Room 250
Hunter-Zaworski, Katherine (Director, National Center for
Accessible Transportation, Corvallis, OR) Universal design in public
transportation: Segway to the future.
Accessible transportation is essential for people with disabilities
to access education and employment, and to live independently. Accessible
transportation is a fundamental human right and this is embodied
in U.S. Federal Civil Rights Legislation, namely the Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA). The fundamental challenge in the planning,
design and operation of accessible transportation services is the
accommodation of the very large spectrum of human abilities. This
paper will present an overview of some of the precepts of universal
design as they are applied to accessible transportation. Translink
is Vancouver BC’s accessible multi-modal transit system and
is used to illustrate a number of aspects of Universal Design in
Accessible Transportation.
Transcript of KatherineHunter-Zaworski
Powerpoint:
Katherine Hunter-Zaworski
4:15 – 5:00 pm Reception and Gallery Tour: Knowlton
Hall Gallery
5:00– 6:15 pm Tour of the Knowlton
School of Architecture & the RPAC
(Recreation and Physical Activity Center) : Tour Meet at the
main entrance to Knowlton Hall.
Plenary Session: Knowlton Hall Auditorium
Room 250
Morton Keston Summit 2006: The Role of Design Professionals
Eleanor Smith (Concrete Change, Atlanta, GA) and Roberta Null (Common
Place Design, Whittier, CA), D'Auray, Mary Lou (CID), and Sullivan,Sylvia.
Moderator: Jon Pynoos.
Friday, July 14, 2006
7:30 – 8:00 am Coffee and Pastries: Open Space
8:00 – 9:15 am Plenary Session: Open Space
Duncan, Dick (Senior Project Manager, Center for Universal
Design, North Carolina State University). Universal Homes and Communities.
This presentation responds to the growing need for information
about changing customer, and home and neighborhood design issues
in the 21st Century. The altered demographics of America have produced
a growing need for homes and communities that better support average
people’s typical activities and are more accommodating when
our abilities change as well. It is insufficient for the occasional
home to have useful features; we need whole neighborhoods full of
better homes, and neighborhoods designed for lifespan utility if
we want to maintain households’ community integration over
time. This session will use examples to review home and community
features that work well for all of us, and a few that don't. The
session will touch on the opportunities and impediments offered
by neo-traditional, mixed use and new urbanist models. This session
will raise the awareness of participants in the basics of universal
home design features and the positive impact of livable and universal
communities.
Transcript of Dick Duncan
Powerpoint: Dick
Duncan
9:15 – 9:30 am Break
9:30 – 10:45 am Breakout Sessions
• Universal Design and Accessibility: Room 175
- Osterberg, Arvid (Iowa State University, Ames, IA). Employing
preferred standards based on common sense and universal design
principles.
Powerpoint:
Arvid Osterberg
- Park, Sohyun (Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ). Accessing
nature as ecological public places: Perspectives of planning the
nature environmental facility in South Korea.
Powerpoint: Sohyun
Park
- Sawadsri, Antika (University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle,
UK). A universal design guideline to accommodate wheelchair occupants.
Powerpoint: Antika Sawadsri
• Policy for Universal Design Visitability: Audits
and Research for Accessibility: Room 176
- Rashtian, Shohreh (University of California, Los Angeles, CA)
Architecture and spatial cognition without sight.
Powerpoint:
Shohreh Rashtian
- Stoddard, Susan (InfoUse, Larkspur, CA). Using disability statistics
in local decision making.
Powerpoint: Susan
Stoddard
• Education: Room 177
- Null, Roberta (Common Place Design, Whittier, CA); Potthoff,
Joy (Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH); and Teaford,
Margaret (The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH). Symposium:
Educating designers and design educators about universal design.
Powerpoint:
Null, Potthoff, Teaford
Transcript of the
Education Session
10:45 -11:00 am Break
11:00– 12:30 pm Lunch and Plenary: Open Space
Bringa, Olav (Consultant to the Norwegian Government and
Project Manager for Norwegian national action plans for accessibility
and universal design). Making universal design work in zoning and
regional planning: A Scandinavian approach.
Universal design may turn out to be the most innovative and significant
development to reach the planning sphere in the past several decades.
The strategy of universal design presents a holistic approach to
how to deal with the interaction between humans and the environment.
The core of this thinking revolves around the important issue of
accessibility for people with reduced functionality based on equal
opportunities and equal rights.
The Norwegian Government is currently in the process of integrating
universal design perspectives into various aspects of national planning
policy. This is a direct result of advances achieved through preliminary
policy development and pilot projects over the last years. County
and municipal plans comprise the main targets for the new initiatives,
which address a number of issues in strategic planning and zoning.
The process of integrating universal design into planning policy
includes revising the Planning Act, expanding government impact
assessment regulations, developing and issuing national policy guidelines
and raising the overall levels of professional competence.
This process brings to light new issues which need be discussed
and clarified. What is the relationship between universal design,
sustainable development, landscape development and protection of
the cultural heritage? Are the universal design principles consistent
with the full scope of the definition of the concept?
Transcript of Olav Bringa
Powerpoint: Olav
Bringa
12:30 -12:45 pm Break
12:45– 2:15 pm Poster Session: Gui Gallery
- Burnham, Katelyn (Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green,
OH). ADA incompliance in today’s built environments.
- Corry, Shauna (University of Idaho, Moscow, ID) A universal
design course: Changing the ’Us’ vs. ‘Them’
attitude with community involvement.
- Elkola, Nermin; Morita, Yoshitsugu; and Hirai, Yasuyuki (Kyushu
University, Fukuoka, Japan). Understanding of the concept of universal
design among overseas and Japanese institutions and manufacturers.
Copy
of Nermin Elkola's paper Powerpoint:
Nermin Elkola
- Hansler, Steven (Maximum Independent Living, Cleveland, OH).
Practical and affordable approaches to universal and accessible
design in housing. Powerpoint:
Steve Hansler
- Hartje, Sandra (Seattle Pacific University, Seattle, WA). Who
says it’s universal? A local case study supports developing
residential standards for universally designed housing.
- Price, Darrell (Access Living, Chicago, IL). Federal visitability:
The inclusive home design act.
- Rossetti, Rosemarie (Rossetti Enterprises, Columbus, OH ). Unveiling
a national model home: The universal design living laboratory.
- Sanderson, Margaret (University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario).
Accessibility planning for persons with disabilities in mid-size
Canadian municipalities. Powerpoint:
Margaret Sanderson
- Smith, Korydon (University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR). Codes
and ideology in housing design: A context for universal design.
Image1
Image2
Image3
2:15 – 3:30 pm Plenary Session, Discussion, and Conference
Closing: Knowlton Hall Auditorium Room 250
Preiser, Wolfgang (Professor of Architecture and Interior
Design, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH). Universal design
paradigm for the 21st Century.
Universal design is about the power of lifting the human spirit
beyond the minimum requirements the American with Disabilities Act
has legislated. In order to ascertain the viability of the Seven
Principles of Universal Design (Preiser and Ostroff, 2001), it will
be necessary to develop objective and explicit performance criteria,
which can be aligned with the traditional 3 levels of priorities,
including: 1. health, safety, security; 2. function, efficiency,
work processes; and 3., social, psychological, cultural performance
(Preiser, 2003). These can be related directly to control mechanisms
common in planning, such as building codes, the life safety code,
zoning regulations, design review, tax incentives and guidance,
which has emanated from environment/behavior research over the past
35 years. Due to the paucity of systematic, universal design evaluation
research (Preiser, 2001), the author proposes to scrutinize case
study examples at the planning and urban scale. The underlying theoretical
framework is feedback based and aiming at continuous quality improvements.
This is in the expectation that universally designed environments
will facilitate their use by a vast majority of people. Some recommendations
will be made for future explorations into the application of universal
design at the urban scale, and to the field of planning in general.
Transcript of Wolfgang Preiser
Powerpoint
of Wolfgang Preiser
Information
For more information, contact Jennifer Evans-Cowley at (614) 247-7479
or by e-mail at ped@knowlton.osu.edu
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
|
|